If we agree with the fact that the subject hallucinates "takes the image of the perception of" what is itself the expression "to take over perception"? Should we, along with some psychologists, to understand by this that gives his own image hallucinates some externality, "projects" him to the world of perceptions? But it would be simply absurd. In fact, the image, as we have seen - it is not a well-defined term which means both some consciousness, and his transcendent correlate. What, then, hallucinates gives this externality? Of course, not consciousness: in fact, it is impossible chtobysoznanie impersonate something other than itself. The Cartesian cogito  retain his rights even psychopaths. But the object of imaginative consciousness can not, apparently, be put outside on the grounds that he is already as such in nature. When I form shaped the consciousness of Pierre, Pierre brings his surreal space and is located in front of the consciousness, it is external to consciousness. The problem, therefore, is entirely different: the image of the object is different from the object of perception, firstly, that has its own space, while for all perceived objects, there is one common infinite space; secondly, the fact that he himself appears as a surreal object, while the object of perception, according to Husserl, originally put forward the claim to its reality (Seinsanspruch ). This unreality shaped object correlative immediate spontaneous intuition. Consciousness has neteticheskim consciousness itself  as a creative activity. This consciousness was spontaneous contact is defined as a cross-consciousness merges with the object of consciousness; it forms a structure of a particular mental state, and by virtue of the manner in which we believed to be independent of whether the patient is healthy or mental state of the subject. So, the question takes the following wording: how can we leave the soil of our consciousness and spontaneous feel their passivity in the face of the images that we actually are forming; whether in the business, we can make reality of the objects that are given to a healthy mind as missing, that is, to make their presence in the flesh? Finally, since, as we have seen  perception and imaginative consciousness are two mutually exclusive installation, if we can in the case of hallucinations combine space image with space perception, as it does hallucinates that, for example, states: "This ( real) I saw a chair (surreal) of the devil? ".